redesigning lclark.edu

LC Redesign: Visual Design

  • 6 August 2008
  • David McKelvey

What follows is a discussion of the website visual design in its current state spanning the four home pages (institutional plus the three schools). It begins with the institutional home page and highlights the major elements and functionality, and then proceeds to the school home pages. To see any of the designs below in a larger size, simply click the design.

Institutional Home Page: Brook Brisson

Site Header (navigation/word mark)

Institutional Home PageThe site header (the top of the page through the tan bar) will be used on every page, regardless of school, department or other page. (As before ~tilde accounts are considered personal space and are not affected by this change.) As many of you have probably experienced, it’s too easy to get lost on the site, and so every page would carry both the school navigation (tan bar) and the meta navigation (text across the top-right of the page). The search function and word mark are included with this section that will be carried through the entire site as well. (I’ll discuss the handwritten word mark shortly.)

School Navigation

Institutional Home Page (CAS Navigation)Institutional Home Page (Law Navigation)Institutional Home Page (Graduate Navigation)The school navigation appears closed by default on the institutional home page but you will be able to click through to any of the primary sub-navigation from the institutional home page. (The navigation operates differently within any school site; see below.) The views at right show the expanded navigation from each school.

While we know that many of our site visitors will not move from school-to-school very often, this series of the three schools together makes it very easy to not get lost, or if you do, get back to where you’d like to be. The other benefit of having the school names/navigation together is a visual one.

Throughout the meetings WW and I had with many members across the three schools, there was great concern about the siloing between the three schools and even within schools — in this design, the three names are closely linked not only with each other, but also in their visual support and proximity to the word mark Lewis & Clark.

Meta Navigation

The meta navigation is another slice of the same thought. It essentially is composed of the elements that all three schools share. The About Us would have not only the institutional “about” but also “abouts” for each of the schools. (Where appropriate, the meta navigation has segmented content.)

Another example is that we have a number of “Portland Oregon” sites, between three admissions offices and alumni, etc., this navigation not only gives us an opportunity to eliminate the duplication of work effort, but also then create a richer Portland sub-site with our role in the community and even some fun elements. The other follow in the same vein and the new web content management system will allow New Media to give people all across campus the ability to edit these pages. So for example, none of the admissions offices would lose their ability to help edit their Portland content.

Handwritten Word Mark

You’ll note that the word mark for Lewis & Clark is shown here in a handwritten style. This is by no means something on which we’ve completely settled, but after talking with everyone and summarizing the experiences we had, the words that kept re-appearing in our discussions were handmade, organic, community, among others.

For me, also being very new to Lewis & Clark, I learned about the unique paths that everyone here seems to take on their journey to us, as well as where they go afterward. Using the handwritten word mark, particularly in conjunction with a main feature with a matching handwritten signature, is in some form, recognizing that this is Brook’s Lewis & Clark.

The handwritten word mark would not be used throughout the site, but only in conjunction with appropriate content. (The school home pages also treat this element differently, so see those notes below.)

Internal navigation

On the right, beneath the school navigation is some new, primarily internal navigation. All the aforementioned navigation would be more externally focused than it is now, and to compensate and really, satisfy another major concern we heard across the campuses, we will be providing links to richer internal content.

The Source

The Source is the same site that public relations began to help communicate and create more community amongst faculty and staff. It may see some growth into providing more content on a more frequent basis and student-focused content, but that is yet to be decided.

The Green

This is a password-protected space for the LC community. To date, we’ve thought about housing carpool listings, a marketplace, a soapbox and other such forum-based content. (By keeping it password-protected, we do not have to monitor language, etc. and I would expect it to be relatively self-policing.) It would also create a virtual space where we might have groups be able to setup pages to help them organize and communicate to the community.

My LC

This is your own personal page for storing links and getting information directed to you. Upon login, we’d know that you might have one or more roles at Lewis & Clark and as a base, the system would suggest some popular links that might be of use to you. You would be able to add or delete links easily, and link suggestions would appear as dismissible notices. What’s more, on every page of the site, we’d have an “add to My LC” link so that you could easily store information pertinent to you. It would also be tied into the notices (as we try to reduce the amount of email we get), so that you would only see notices or announcements which apply to you.

This function would not be limited to the LC community alone however, if you were an alum or prospective student, you would also be able to create a My LC. In the case of a prospective student, you might choose “Graduate School Prospective Student” as an option and then, not only would Becky Haas get an email noting the sign up, but then, she would be able to push information of interest to the prospective student’s My LC. (Again, completely and easily dismissible by the recipient, so as not to be an annoyance and reduce usage.)

You will note that we are, with intent, breaking one of our own rules about our brand here. We almost always spell out “Lewis & Clark” rather than use any abbreviation, and only then use the approved “L&C”. However, as many community members know, no one speaks the ampersand when referring to themselves or a campus/school organization. Not using the ampersand for this feature is a specific recognition that if you have that level of relationship with us, we know that you don’t use the ampersand. For lack of a better term, it’s our secret handshake.

Blogs

This on is simple; we already have so many of our members that blog, we are simply going to show the richness that is already there.

Informational Content

Moving below the main feature, we have three primary areas for different forms of dynamic content — meaning always updated all the time. From left to right, they are: People, Headlines and Events.

People

If you’ve seen the new Expertise and Excellence appear on the home pages, you’ll recognize a lot of what were doing here. Basically, People simply has little blurbs and information on the great things that our community members are already doing, be it getting an award, speaking and an event, or being published. It includes all three schools and students, faculty and staff.

Headlines

This is the most recent news from a variety of Lewis & Clark sources.

Events

This is event-related content from on campus and off, so that we can include events held in Portland (among other locations). If you’ve noted the “On Campus” section of the home page, this would be very similar without the limiting name.

Portland-scape

Still somewhat in the draft stage is the Portland-scape directly beneath the informational content. This would effectively help us bring in more of our “In and Of Portland” theme into the design. We’re still playing with both the design and the functionality, but from the current mock-up, you should get a sense of where we are heading. (Suggestions? Make a comment.)

Site Footer

The site footer is exists beneath the page end and like the site header will be present on every page. It holds all the basic reference and contact information for the main site, as well as the shield and official word mark. Sub-sites are likely to include additional information pertinent to that site/page/content, but a good portion of this content will remain.

Page Feature

Now returning to the center of the page and the primary content of the page. Between the above example and this one, you can see two versions of how this space might be used. We will begin using the short phrase “Uncommon Journeys” for some, but not all of the stories that we tell in this area.

Function

Functionally, they will either have built-in audio and video, which would be watchable right in the page, or link out to a text story with images. (I suppose we could also run a slide show in the space as well — the intent is left open for the best adaptation for the story to tell.)

Timeline

Each story would be up for at least one day and could persist for as much as a week or so before being replaces, depending on the nature of the content.

Design

As for design, we will be writing rules to define what images work best in this space as one requirement is that the “title” image must break the left boundary of the page. Naturally, building a resource of imagery and story content is expected to be a challenge, but a doable one.

Content

Finally, as I hinted above, the content is not necessarily going to tell a story the we would call an “Uncommon Journey”. Frankly, the consultants felt that there are always going to be things that we might want to feature and forcing that content into a specific container would only hinder us. So, while no ratio yet exists, I would expect that the Uncommon Journeys content would hover around fifty percent with the balance made up of other types of content.

Call to Action

Just to the right of the main feature (and beneath the internal content links) is the Uncommon Journeys call to action. We do know that building a content stream to supply us with stories for this section is going to be a significant (but not insurmountable) challenge, and at that same time, that building a better connection with our alumni and internal communities was highlighted as a significant need by both the market research and our own meetings in this process. The call to action helps with both.

Please reference the site header regarding the link between the signature (as shown in the Brook Brisson example) in the main feature and the word mark.

School Home Pages

What are the differences?

College Home PageLaw Home PageGraduate Home PageFrom the designs are right, you can see that many of the same elements on the institutional home page design persist through to the school home pages, so the following is a discussion of what’s different.

Word Mark

Unlike the institutional home page, the word mark at the top of the page varies depending on the school rather than the content in the feature area. For the College, it will be written by a current student. For both the Law and Graduate schools, it will remain as the official Goudy word mark. In each of these cases, this is an important distinction based on the primary audiences of each school.

Navigation

First of all, whenever you are within a school site, that school’s navigation is open and available. It features sub-navigational elements, and each of which has a drop-down menu, so that you can quickly move throughout the site. (And again, since this navigation would exist everywhere on the site, it’s much harder to get lost within a school site, or even between the schools, since the exposure of the navigation gives you an immediately visible response of where you are.

Feature Area

Each of the main feature areas is thinner, to allow for additional “above the fold” school-specific content to be determined by each school. For distinction, each school has a defined accent color for navigational and title elements. (We aren’t fully committed to the colors shown, but they are proving to be our favorites to date.) Also, to facilitate easier content development, the main feature are does not break the left-hand barrier out of the “page”.

Informational Content

As you might expect, the informational content is tweaked to each school’s need. This is not only in the actual content, but also the groupings that are made. For example, “People” doesn’t persist through, although similar school-specific content might.

Portland-scape

To keep the home pages consistent with their enclosed sites and pages, the Portland-scape remains only on the institutional home page.

Filed Under

Comments

Morgan Grether on 7 August, 2008 at 11:16 am

I like the “Portland-scape” a lot! It is pretty without being photographic; it is informative (i.e., Lewis & Clark is in Portland, OR); it has a layered quality that adds depth; it is asymmetrical, keeping things from being too boxy, but not to the point of throwing the eye out of kilter.

Brian Federico on 7 August, 2008 at 11:58 am

I agree with Morgan, mostly. the cityscape works well. My only concern is that it looks a little too “cartoony” in respect to the rest of the site. It stands out too much, looks a little odd. But the idea is creating the impact it was intended to, i think.

Isaac Holeman on 9 August, 2008 at 3:59 pm

Hi,

First, I’d like to introduce myself. My name is Isaac, I’m going to be a senior this year, and my perspective on web disign - a few school projects:
http://healthcultureandsociety.nfshost.com/
http://acappellaumbrella.nfshost.com/
And I’m a co-founder here:
http://www.squarepegged.org

And before I give feedback, Thank You! for this undertaking. The current front page is decent enough visually, but the underbelly that is more than a year old is pretty grotesque.

So, there is one main red flag for me - a HUGE problem with brand consistency. Not among the designs you have here, but comparing these designs to the rest of the school. What happened to school colors? What about the typefaces we see in the gym and all the signs around campus and on the raz? Even our shield logo at the bottom isn’t in school colors! Maybe we’re on the verge of a complete re-branding that I’m not aware of, with green and beige as the new school colors? :(. After a few very active years at LC I think fostering community is the most significant challenge we face, it affects everything from student life to alumni giving, and I really think a little more pride in the ol’ orange and black would help. When the raz was repainted a year or two ago a lot of people missed our old distinctly blue bus, but I think it was a successful change. It said, look these are the colors that represent our school, and we’re not ashamed of that. It was maybe a tad bit cheesy, perhaps it wasn’t shockingly creative, but it was proud and our student body NEEDS that.

Right now I think the minimal orange in the links on the right sidebar just sort of blend in with all the tan an beige, they don’t come off looking like Lewis & Clark Orange. Just an idea, maybe you could see what it looks like to set the background to a charcoal fading to black at the bottom (think forest at night), or just have it be actual forest colors, but then fade into black. Get rid of some of the beige (that just seems like an old person color to me), and have the orange play a more prominent role.

I like the general information architecture, the prominent place for people at LC and LC blogs is great! And I like the Portland landscape at the bottom. It’s bold, and it’s us. Adding the landscape to some of the other flourishes I think is too much though. What is the purpose of having the title image break the left boundary, or having the thumbnails at the bottom tilted? To me (and I think many many of us digital natives), that just looks like you’re trying too hard to be cooler than you are. This isn’t a graphic designer’s portfolio, it the site for a prestigious college. I also doubt it would be a huge hit with older alums, and given what those flourishes gain for the people who do like them (not a deal breaker, I’d imagine), I don’t think it’s worth it at all. If you are really determined to appear trendy, I would try to find something less visually jarring and more creative. Maybe you could have the landscape look like a morning scape, midday, evening, or night depending on the time of day. This would be charmingly harry potterish (like the ceiling in great hall at hogwarts that reflects the weather outside, harry potter is HUGE at LC in case you didn’t notice), but also might be overboard, it would depend on how it was implemented. This is also something you could just try out on one of the pages (like the undergrad, for example). Subtle changes to the gradient of the background that reflected the time of day might even be more appropriate than tilting the images.

I’m also not a huge fan of the hand written word mark for a few reasons. I think the goal is really important, trying to reflect prominent LC themes you mentioned: “handmade, organic, community, among others.” Personally, I just think “who’s handwriting is that?” The same goes for Brook Brisson’s name being written out like that. Most people have signatures that are either ugly or illegible (or both), and I immediately suspect that some person in pub com just wrote her name like that for her. And the person in pub com is hidden of course, I don’t get to peek at their identity, so it doesn’t come off as personal.

It’s probably me being immersed in the social web again (like most LC students), if any piece of text is supposed to be personal, I should be able to associate the text with the identity of it’s creator. For text that isn’t created by a single person, I would normally expect it to represent institutional or organizational guidelines. If text and images seem to try to pretend they have a personal identity (like the hand written word mark or the personal signature that may or may not be a real signature), my response is that I suspect its authenticity, even if I don’t realize it. Most people probably won’t pick up on this exactly, but if you get people saying “it doesn’t look very professional” or “it looks like a blog not a college website,” I imagine that what they are picking up on is that these designs seem to try to fit the personal individual model, when it is obvious that they represent an institutional collective model.

Solutions? Well, like I said before I think featuring blogs is a great way to get personal. What if you had an uncommon journeys blog where people would post about their stories, rather than being interviewed (interviews are great, you could just feature those elsewhere)? Individuals could even get help editing from the pub com crew, as long as it was truly their words. Then you could include a powerful quotation (with clear quotation marks, so that people knew it was her words, not the marketing team’s words).That would take up about as much space as the big signature you have there now, and for me it would be a lot more personal, and authentic.

I hope this feedback helps. As it stands right now, I would choose our current institutional page (not the pages for the individual colleges), over these proposed re-designs. The landscape and the forest background are great ways of sending the message, “we are progressive, we are Portland.” I would like it better if it said “we are progressive, we are Portland, and we are proud that as the very first nonprofit corporation (or corporation of any kind) in the state of Oregon, we’ve been cultivating the most earthy and innovative professionals around for more than a hundred and fifty years.” In order to capture that pride, I think we need to use school colors. We also need to convey that we’re basically the best education you can get in an organic hand made type of community, and to do that I think get rid of the handwritten stuff.

look forward to meeting y’all at piofair.
cheers
Isaac

Matthew West on 11 August, 2008 at 10:04 am

First of all, let me say, the general look and feel is a vast improvement upon our ’90s version with Trillium.

I do have to agree with Brian and Morgan on all counts. My thoughts about the cityscape: It does look a bit cartoony when compared to the nice trees in the header. Maybe a slightly more photo realistic or slightly different palette could make it fit nicely.

Way to go guys! What a great concept!

jason on 11 August, 2008 at 11:27 am

Morgan, Brian, Matthew,
Glad you all agree in principle with the idea of the cityscape here. One thing to note that might not be clear from the mockups: On all but the largest monitors, you’ll rarely see the cityscape without scrolling. (If you’ve clicked through to the full size mockup, you know what I mean.) It’s intended to be something of a “reward” for scrolling down the page; ideally it won’t advertise itself too obtrusively, but rather be waiting at page bottom to provide some Portland context when you get down there.

hdr on 11 August, 2008 at 9:26 pm

Wow, I really enjoy this new design. It’s very classy looking and easy to follow!

Alan Humphrey on 12 August, 2008 at 10:04 am

This design is a step in the right direction. Issac is right on about consistency with the rest of the school branding. This doesn’t look like Lewis & Clark.

I really don’t like the hand written word mark. It doesn’t belong on a home page, either institutional or school based. There you want to be establishing and reinforcing the school identity. The hand written word mark could be used elsewhere, say on the Admissions page where you’re trying to create a connection with prospective students.

If there must be a handwritten word mark on a home page it should be that of Meriwether and William (I have no idea what their signatures look like) to reinforce the ideas of history and exploration.

Re: The Green - what is the definition of “community”? In the past this has meant “on-campus community” (i.e. staff, faculty, and current students). If this is the definition then do you want a password protected link prominently displayed on the home page? It’s not exactly welcoming for an alum to click on a link only to be told, in essence, “you’re not part of the community”.

Re: My LC - great idea. I especially like that you’ve thought about how alumni might play here. I don’t buy the reasoning behind not including the ampersand. Either branding is important or it isn’t. It doesn’t matter that people don’t pronounce the ampersand - we have all kinds of silent letters in our language, right (rite)? “My L&C” works just as well. I think you have to have the ampersand if you’re going to have that feature on the home page.

Chris on 12 August, 2008 at 2:45 pm

And further to Alan’s handwriting point. . .Perhaps a technical point, but my guess is that text images pasted in (like Brooke’s signature) make it difficult to spell check final versions before publishing. Is it Brook or Brooke after all? You have it several ways in the same paragraph.

Hanna Neuschwander on 14 August, 2008 at 9:32 am

David & Co.:
Congratulations on a long-overdue milestone! I agree with some of the reservations expressed about the look of the site. Isaac raises some good points about the authenticity expressed by the word mark and the images popping out of the left frame — although I think both are movements in the right direction regarding bringing a level of human warmth to the site that’s been missing. Most prospective students, in particular, are savvier than I can even imagine when it comes to sussing out what is “real” and what isn’t, so I give some credence to the doubts Issac expressed. I do like the larger, more prominent photo field on all four pages, though (I know it’s just a mock up, but when this thing goes live, I’d love to see faces instead of buildings on the grad school’s page). For me the most important and impressive success is in improving the navigation. It’s a huge leap forward for us. We can tinker and tweak the presentation over the next couple of years, but having the organizational piece that underpins everything is massively important, and I really like what you’ve done with it. The connection between the three schools is so much clearer in this version as well. My major concern remains how the emphasis on storytelling will play out practically — do we have the resources to be cycling new stories in every day? Even every week? As this is the centerpiece of the page design, I think it’s essential that this be addressed sooner than later. (Or is the lack of a main story tied to the photo field on the grad school’s page an indication that the story element wouldn’t necessarily be foregrounded in all cases?)

In any case, so far, I’m impressed. You’re doing a great job. Thanks, White Whale!

p.s. Dig the forest background, and those textures in the cityscape.

Post a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>