redesigning lclark.edu

Rethinking Lots of Links

  • 4 April 2008
  • Robb Shecter

Here’s a very interesting article at Slate, saying that we’ve just gone too far:

 Almost any Washingtonpost.com or Nytimes.com news story demonstrates the sites’ link-happy tendencies. A good example of the Washingtonpost.com’s overkill is this Page One story from Monday about the alleged budget crunch faced by some states. In the first 95 words, the story links IllinoisCook CountyMichigan,New JerseyCalifornia, and San Fernando Valley to Washingtonpost.com landing pages…  Of what use are such landing pages? For the reader, little. They exist for the publisher to serve another page of ads and to optimize search engine results. 

Links That Stink: http://www.slate.com/id/2188011?nav=wp 

Filed Under

Comments

Morgan Grether on 4 April, 2008 at 3:27 pm

Love it.

Curt on 7 April, 2008 at 11:29 pm

They are trying to monetize their online content. Since it’s pointless to the user like you indicated, users won’t follow the links or click on the ads. They will eventually stop doing it that way and try something else annoying.

Post a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>